Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Joined: Jan 2021
Posts: 11
R
Rakesh Offline OP
Forum Member
OP Offline
Forum Member
R
Joined: Jan 2021
Posts: 11
Hi, I am simulating a peptide having alternating L and D amino-acid in lipid bilayer (DMPC). So I use the input generator for protein/membrane complex in CHARMM GUI and I run standard mdp files in gromacs.(force field that I have opt for is CHARMM36)
>
> My aim for simulation is to observe the dihedral angle of each residue in ramachandran plot.
>
> Error that I am getting-
> My peptide is 14 residue peptide and everything run flawlessly but after extracting the data for dihedral angle and plotting it I can see one D amino acid residue is in second quadrant of ramachandran plot. It's a disallowed region for D amino-acid residue right?
>
> I am attaching a drive link here in which there is a screenshot of DALA-6 ramachandran plot and there you can see some dihedral angle come in second quadrant and some in 3rd which is not allowed region for D aminoacid.

and in LD14_2_updated folder that i have attached there are all files including initial structure, mdp files that i have generated by charmm gui.
link-
https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=12D-ikoZYjbNN09XxpBZfvkbLYa8dX49U

please have a look and do comment if something seems wrong.

>
I have done the whole simulation in gromacs
> A quick reply would be appreciated
>

Last edited by Rakesh; 01/18/21 08:41 PM.
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 8,658
Likes: 26
rmv Online Content
Forum Member
Online Content
Forum Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 8,658
Likes: 26
If you think it's a CHARMM-GUI problem, you should use the Contact page on their site.

If you think it's a force field problem, you may have to show that with some simple tests that demonstrate the issue more clearly than you have done here.

We cannot help you with Gromacs problems, or problems with the force field conversion.


Rick Venable
computational chemist

Joined: Jan 2021
Posts: 11
R
Rakesh Offline OP
Forum Member
OP Offline
Forum Member
R
Joined: Jan 2021
Posts: 11
Ok,
One thing I wanted know can this kind of switch happen during simulation?

This is not a gromacs problem nor forcefield as I have erformed simulation for smaller peptide like 2residue ,6 residue ,10 residue and 12 residue there I got good ramification. That's why I am bewildered.

Is there any way to rebuild the Hydrogen or position the Hydrogen according to D chirality ?

Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,883
Likes: 12
Forum Member
Offline
Forum Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,883
Likes: 12
No, such switches do not normally happen. Did you specify in any way that you have D-amino acids in you system? This is necessary - even though the standard terms in the force field are symmetric wrt L- and D-amino acids, the CMAP cross terms are different and so you need to use toppar_all36_prot_c36_d_aminoacids.str and the residue names in it; this is in CHARMM, I have no idea about CHARMM-GUI or GROMACS.


Lennart Nilsson
Karolinska Institutet
Stockholm, Sweden
Joined: Jan 2021
Posts: 11
R
Rakesh Offline OP
Forum Member
OP Offline
Forum Member
R
Joined: Jan 2021
Posts: 11
Yes I do have specified while generating input in charmm-gui.

Most imperative question is that ; why only one D amino acid residue switch while all other 5 D amino acid residue acquire their position in allowed region .

I have attached the drive link please have a look in LD14_2_updated folder in it where there is sub folder named TOPPAR consisting of forcefield.itp and PROA.itp which has all the paramater and CMAP.

Can you please have a look?

I am a tyro in this field that's why facing problem.


Thank you in advance

Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,883
Likes: 12
Forum Member
Offline
Forum Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,883
Likes: 12
You should probably consult GROMACS support.


Lennart Nilsson
Karolinska Institutet
Stockholm, Sweden
Joined: Jan 2021
Posts: 11
R
Rakesh Offline OP
Forum Member
OP Offline
Forum Member
R
Joined: Jan 2021
Posts: 11
Sorry to say but they have told me to ask here in CHARMM forum. In that way i am not getting help 😒.

Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 8,658
Likes: 26
rmv Online Content
Forum Member
Online Content
Forum Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 8,658
Likes: 26
Chiral inversion can happen, and often does in various enhanced sampling methods, so it is something to check for.

The best way to do that is to compute the improper dihedral, defined as the angle between two planes determined by 3 atoms: for amino acids, one plane is defined by N,CA,C and the other by N,CB,C and the angle should be ca. +120 or -120 depending on the chirality.

Besides enhanced sampling, a lack of careful model building can also cause chiral inversions, for example if there are large forces from bad contacts where some atoms are too close to each other.


Rick Venable
computational chemist

Joined: Jan 2021
Posts: 11
R
Rakesh Offline OP
Forum Member
OP Offline
Forum Member
R
Joined: Jan 2021
Posts: 11
Ok thank you I will look into it.

One thing I observe is that conformation may not be switching from D to L but after I plot the phi psi angle in ramachandran plot I see a some data goes in 2nd quadrant for D amino acid and some data in usual allowed region for D residue.

How can we explain this ?

Joined: Jan 2021
Posts: 11
R
Rakesh Offline OP
Forum Member
OP Offline
Forum Member
R
Joined: Jan 2021
Posts: 11
How to compute the improper dihedral mentioned by you ?

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  BRBrooks, lennart, rmv 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.31-1~deb10u5 Page Time: 0.013s Queries: 35 (0.009s) Memory: 0.7815 MB (Peak: 0.8743 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2023-09-27 21:29:19 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS