Dear all , I used the script to caculate the density (water + protein) , and find the final density = 0.212099 . It's not reasonable . The density (water + protein) should be near 1 (g/cc) . yeng tseng
Yes you seem to have too little water in you system. How big is your protein? How many water molecules do you have? What does your box look like (edgelengths)?
Lennart Nilsson Karolinska Institutet Stockholm, Sweden
calc XSIZ = INT( ?XMAX - ?XMIN + 16) RDCMND substituted energy or value "?XMAX" to "20.1479" RDCMND substituted energy or value "?XMIN" to "-18.9459" Evaluating: INT(20.1479--18.9459+16) Parameter: XSIZ <- "55"
CHARMM> calc YSIZ = INT( ?YMAX - ?YMIN + 16) RDCMND substituted energy or value "?YMAX" to "13.4203" RDCMND substituted energy or value "?YMIN" to "-12.5572" Evaluating: INT(13.4203--12.5572+16) Parameter: YSIZ <- "41"
CHARMM> calc ZSIZ = INT( ?ZMAX - ?ZMIN + 16) RDCMND substituted energy or value "?ZMAX" to "11.4326" RDCMND substituted energy or value "?ZMIN" to "-13.2873" Evaluating: INT(11.4326--13.2873+16) Parameter: ZSIZ <- "40"
orthogonal lattice of protein +water has a size of 55 41 40angs, how could i find total thickness of the water shell i wish to extract the system protein +water at different thickness?(commands like show shth ? show shell?)
inorder to chnage the existing script as a cubic system , besides size of the protein i added different integers to find the uniform size of cubic crystal
calc XSIZ = INT( ?XMAX - ?XMIN + 2) RDCMND substituted energy or value "?XMAX" to "20.1479" RDCMND substituted energy or value "?XMIN" to "-18.9459" Evaluating: INT(20.1479--18.9459+2) Parameter: XSIZ <- "40"
CHARMM> calc YSIZ = INT( ?YMAX - ?YMIN + 15) RDCMND substituted energy or value "?YMAX" to "13.4203" RDCMND substituted energy or value "?YMIN" to "-12.5572" Evaluating: INT(13.4203--12.5572+15) Parameter: YSIZ <- "40"
CHARMM> calc ZSIZ = INT( ?ZMAX - ?ZMIN + 16) RDCMND substituted energy or value "?ZMAX" to "11.4326" RDCMND substituted energy or value "?ZMIN" to "-13.2873" Evaluating: INT(11.4326--13.2873+16) Parameter: ZSIZ <- "40"
!now i defined the uniform size crystal define cubic @xsize @ysize@zsize 90 90 90 crystal facility cutoff 14.0 is this is the way of doing cubic steup?
"coor stat sele protein end" will give you the dimensions of your protein, and "coor stat" will give the total dimensions. This may help you figure out the thickness of your "water shell" (at least along the x,y,z axes).
If you know that you want a 40x40x40 cubic box all the CALC commands are unnecesary. This suffices: crystal define cubic 40.0 40.0 40.0 90.0 90.0 90.0 crystal build cutoff 20.0 If your cube is packed with atoms a shorter cutoff can be used; the important fact is that you want 26 images for a cubic system.
Use the POST function of the forums for new posts, not the REPLY.
Lennart Nilsson Karolinska Institutet Stockholm, Sweden
I was using run-cpt-md.inp script, But since ORTH is not recommended I substituted it with another isotropic shape viz OCTA
but I encountered following error:-
CHARMM> ! setup Periodic Boundary Conditions CHARMM> ! Here we have to use the crystal facility CHARMM> ! Variables XSIZ,YSIZ, and ZSIZ have already been defined CHARMM> crystal define OCTAhedral @XSIZ @YSIZ @ZSIZ 109.47 109.47 109.47 Parameter: XSIZ -> "65.0" Parameter: YSIZ -> "65.0" Parameter: ZSIZ -> "65.0" XTLSYM> DIFF,RSMALL 0.3053E-02 0.1000E-09 XTLSYM> XTLTYP=OCTA XTLABC: 62.546656 -12.508314 62.546656 -12.508314 -12.508314 62.546656
***** LEVEL -4 WARNING FROM <XTLSYM> ***** ***** Shape matrix symmetry is not conserved ****************************************** BOMLEV ( -2) IS REACHED - TERMINATING. WRNLEV IS 5
Can someone suggest what went wrong? I am attaching my output script.
Last edited by vbrahma; 10/04/0712:33 PM.
Vijaya Brahma
Research Scholar
Institute of MIcrobial Technology
India
I have a question regarding the temperature control in this script. I can't see neither BERE nor NOSE nor HOOVER keywords. Yet you use "ichecw 1" and "iasors 1".
Does it mean that the temperature is controlled by scaling the velocities when temperatures lies outside TWINDH\L?
Yes - from dynamc.doc: ICHECW 1 The option for checking to see if the average temperature of the system lies within the allotted temperature window (between FINALT+TWINDH and FINALT+TWINDL) every IEQFRQ steps.
For a well behaved system the temperature is usually quite stable and this simple scheme seldom interferes to rescale velocities (if at all); if it has t do many rescaling it works in a similar way as a Berendsen thermostat.
Lennart Nilsson Karolinska Institutet Stockholm, Sweden