|
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 4
Forum Member
|
OP
Forum Member
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 4 |
Dear Charmm Users, As we known, in traditional generalized Born (GB) model, the hydrophobic effect is considered by taking the solvent accessible surface area (SASA) as a proxy of the its extend in energy. The nonpolar solvation free energy isn't the function of coordinate, so the hydrophobic force isnot obtained by the derivative of energy with respect to its coordinate. The model may be controversial because we only account for its impact in energy and the hydrophobic force is neglected in MD simulation using AMBER software. In the charmm, is the nonpolar solvation free energy also calculated by the aSASA+b? Is the hydrophobic force considered in MD, if yes, how to add the hydrophobic force in every MD step? Thank you very much !
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,863 Likes: 10
Forum Member
|
Forum Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,863 Likes: 10 |
Two ways: Use explicit solvent. Most implicit solvent implementations in CHARMM also contain a "hydrophobic" component, see eg the SA and GBVDW keywords for the GBMV methods (gbmv.doc). Read the 2009 J Comp Chem CHARMM paper, section on implicit models.
Lennart Nilsson Karolinska Institutet Stockholm, Sweden
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 4
Forum Member
|
OP
Forum Member
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 4 |
I have read the papers: J Comput Chem 24: 1348–1356, 2003 and the 2009 J Comp Chem CHARMM paper. I donot find the discussion for hydrophobic force in MD using implicit model. Thank you !
Last edited by duanll; 03/31/12 09:44 AM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,863 Likes: 10
Forum Member
|
Forum Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,863 Likes: 10 |
"hydrophobic" and "hydrophobicity" are mentioned several times in Section III.D of the 2009 paper, and also in the 2003 paper. Most of the models in CHARMM deal with solvation free energies, which include both polar and non-polar components So I think the answer to your question is, yes, forces due to the "hydrophobic" effect are included at each MD step. For technical details you can start by looking at the papers referenced in the two JCC papers.
Lennart Nilsson Karolinska Institutet Stockholm, Sweden
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,535
Forum Member
|
Forum Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,535 |
Also, I might have misunderstood the original post, but the SASA is most definitely a function of the coordinates.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 4
Forum Member
|
OP
Forum Member
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 4 |
If the SASA is a function of the coordinates,and there is a derivative of this function to get hydrophobic forces. For the linear protein, the added hydrophobic force will be very strong and it will cause the linear protein become the global protein. Is it unreasonalbe? Thanks!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,863 Likes: 10
Forum Member
|
Forum Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,863 Likes: 10 |
Globular proteins are common, but there are also proteins with quite elongated shape.
Lennart Nilsson Karolinska Institutet Stockholm, Sweden
|
|
|
|
|